A trillion‑dollar industry is undergoing a major reshuffle! The new national standard for man-made boards will officially take effect on June 1.

2026-06-01 Source: China Wood Industry Network News Department

On June 1, 2026, the new national standard GB 18580-2025 for formaldehyde emissions from man-made boards will officially come into mandatory effect.

To the average consumer, this is merely a new industry regulation that makes home‑decor panels more environmentally friendly and ensures greater household health and safety. But for the trillion‑yuan panel‑and‑furniture supply chain, it represents a long‑overdue, comprehensive, and irreversible industrial upgrade.

Amid the relentless reshuffling, the era of opportunistic profiteering has come to an end; the true industry-wide consolidation is only just beginning.

Step by step, industries and enterprises evolve in tandem.

China’s national standard for formaldehyde emissions in man-made boards has been inextricably linked to the fate of the man-made board industry since its inception.

On January 1, 2002, China’s first national standard for formaldehyde emissions from man-made boards—GB 18580-2001—came into effect. At the time, the man-made board industry was experiencing explosive growth, with production capacity rapidly expanding; however, product quality was uneven, and complaints about formaldehyde pollution surged. This standard introduced, for the first time, two-tiered emission limits—E1 and E2—and adopted a parallel testing approach, employing three methods—the perforation extraction method, the desiccator method, and the climate chamber method. By doing so, it brought an end to the era of unregulated, rapid expansion in China’s man-made board sector and established the industry’s first environmental safeguard.

Although this version of the standard took into account the overall technological level of the domestic industry at the time and left room for small and medium-sized enterprises to survive, it also marked the first major turning point in the industry’s restructuring: small workshops with outdated technology and weak environmental awareness were gradually phased out for failing to meet the requirements, while companies with a certain degree of technical capability began to adjust their adhesive formulations and optimize their production processes, thereby developing an initial awareness of environmental management.

Over time, the market landscape has quietly shifted. As sector‑specific tailwinds fade and overcapacity persists, industry profit margins have continued to shrink. Even more concerning is that the regulatory framework—characterized by the coexistence of multiple testing methods under the old standards—contains significant loopholes, enabling many firms to sidestep compliance requirements. This has resulted in inconsistent product quality and severely undermined the orderly, sustainable development of the market.

To this end, the man-made board industry entered a critical period of regulatory restructuring in 2017 with the implementation of GB 18580‑2017. This version not only completely abolished the transitional E2‑grade threshold and established E1 as the mandatory minimum standard for all man-made board products, but also put an end to the chaotic coexistence of multiple testing methods by designating the one‑cubic‑meter climate chamber method as the sole legally recognized arbitration test procedure, thereby closing longstanding regulatory loopholes in the industry.

Although this standard has significantly raised the entry threshold, further accelerating the phase-out of outdated production capacity, it has not made E0‑grade compliance mandatory, leaving it as a voluntary choice for manufacturers. As a result, the engineered wood panel market has entered a dual‑tier structure: E1‑grade products have become the volume‑driving workhorses, while E0‑grade panels are increasingly relegated to high‑end marketing differentiators.

New regulations are on the horizon—say goodbye to patchwork optimizations.

While regulations set clear boundaries, they have also kept the engineered‑wood industry’s green transformation stuck in a reactive, compliance‑driven mode. The sector has struggled to achieve comprehensive high‑end and standardized upgrades, with the root cause lying in the “flexible leeway” built into the existing standards framework. Consequently, the new national standard for formaldehyde emissions from engineered wood—GB 18580‑2025—released nine years later represents a thorough overhaul of the entire system, rather than the incremental, patchwork improvements seen in the previous two iterations.

The new standard breaks with the previous one‑size‑fits‑all regulatory approach, establishing a tiered, category‑specific, and rigorously precise formaldehyde emission control system that clearly distinguishes environmental limit requirements for wood-based panel substrates and finished wood‑based panel products. Among these, Plywood 、 Particleboard 、 Plywood For basic engineered‑board substrates, formaldehyde emissions must strictly comply with the E1 standard, with a limit of ≤0.124 mg/m³. End‑use engineered‑board products—such as wood flooring, wooden doors, veneered panels, and wooden furniture components—are mandatorily brought under E0‑level control, with the formaldehyde emission limit tightened to ≤0.050 mg/m³, marking a significant leap forward in environmental standards for finished home‑use products.

Meanwhile, the new standard further clarifies product testing methods and labeling requirements, reducing the duration of climate‑chamber testing from 72 hours to 48 hours. This not only enhances testing efficiency but also maintains the accuracy of assessments that closely reflect real‑world home environments, enabling product environmental‑performance ratings to be quantified, traceable, and subject to regulatory oversight. As a result, it effectively eliminates regulatory gaps in the industry and puts an end to the market’s longstanding disorder—characterized by uneven grading and the coexistence of high‑ and low‑quality products.

Competition is shifting, with value replacing price.

This top-down standards revolution will also impose uniform, high‑intensity pressure on all companies across the industry, compelling them to undergo fundamental restructuring.

China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of man-made boards, yet despite a market size worth trillions, the industry remains highly fragmented. A large number of small and medium-sized factories and family-run workshops survive on low costs and minimal standards, engaging in relentless price wars in the low-end segment by cutting environmental compliance expenses and streamlining production processes.

The new national standard is the stop button that puts an end to this low‑price price war.

For small and medium-sized manufacturers that have long relied on low‑priced, high‑volume sales of E1‑grade products, lack core technologies, and are reluctant to increase environmental investments, the new standards represent a sharp tightening of their survival threshold. Stringent mandatory limit values and standardized testing protocols will substantially raise production costs and compliance barriers, leaving many outdated, inefficient capacity with no viable footing and accelerating their exit from the market.

Meanwhile, for leading companies that have proactively invested in green upgrades, mastered core technologies in formaldehyde-free adhesives, and established large-scale production capabilities, this represents a rare opportunity to emerge stronger from the industry reshuffle. Their long‑accumulated advantages in technology, quality control, and branding will be fully leveraged, turning their previously differentiated premium positioning into a core competitive edge across all market segments and widening the gap with smaller and midsize brands.

The Path to Corporate Survival: No Passive Compliance, Only Proactive Upgrading

With the new regulations now in effect, some see it as a crisis, while others view it as an opportunity. Industry insiders know full well that short-term pain is inevitable, but in the long run, it will benefit the entire value chain.

At this stage, many companies are engaged in reactive compliance, inventory clearance, and process adjustments. However, to secure a solid foothold in the next wave of industry consolidation, simply meeting regulatory standards is far from sufficient; they must proactively undertake comprehensive upgrades.

First and foremost, we must eliminate risks at the source. The primary source of formaldehyde is adhesives; companies must completely abandon the outdated production mindset of relying on low‑cost adhesives and then attempting to offset environmental shortcomings through formaldehyde‑removal sprays and sealing treatments. Instead, they should drive the iterative upgrading of their adhesive systems, gradually replacing conventional adhesives with eco‑friendly alternatives such as MDI‑free adhesives, modified low‑formaldehyde urea‑formaldehyde resins, and plant‑based adhesives. By strengthening the foundation of low‑formaldehyde and formaldehyde‑free production at the raw‑material stage, they can eliminate the uncertainties associated with end‑of‑line remediation and ensure that formaldehyde emissions remain stable and controllable.

Xingang Bionic Adhesive—Formulated with Zero Formaldehyde, Zero Benzene, and No Harmful Additives

Secondly, it is essential to rigorously control every stage of the supply chain. Achieving environmental compliance for board materials requires not just meeting standards at a single point, but ensuring full-chain conformity across raw materials, manufacturing, processing, and finished products—each link can indirectly affect the formaldehyde emission levels of the final product. This necessitates that companies overhaul their supply-chain quality‑control systems: establish robust screening mechanisms for base‑material procurement; conduct comprehensive environmental‑compliance verification and registration for all auxiliary materials; standardize and lock in production process parameters; and simultaneously optimize workshop‑level production‑management procedures. By doing so, they can prevent product‑quality violations caused by substandard raw materials, non‑compliant processes, or inadequate oversight, thereby advancing from isolated compliance at individual points to end-to-end regulatory adherence.

Finally, it is essential to establish a normalized quality‑control system. Compliance is not a short‑term fix but a sustained commitment. Companies must abandon the traditional approach of ad‑hoc rectification and superficial spot checks, and instead build a robust, routine testing framework coupled with end-to-end traceability. On the one hand, they should equip themselves with qualified professionals… Testing equipment , we have established mechanisms for batch sampling inspections, retained‑sample retesting, and temperature‑and‑humidity‑simulation testing to ensure that the formaldehyde emission levels and environmental compliance indicators of every batch consistently meet national standards. Meanwhile, we have refined our product traceability records, meticulously documenting and archiving raw‑material batches, production dates, process parameters, test reports, and shipping information throughout the entire lifecycle, thereby enabling full traceability, verifiability, and certification. This approach strengthens quality control, builds brand trust, and helps us break free from low‑end, homogeneous competition.

The reshaping of value under the new regulations has already begun; the end of the E1 era marks not only an upgrade in standards but also an industrial transformation.

This industry reshuffle, ushered in by the new standards, has weeded out outdated capacity and inefficient practices, paving the way for a future of standardized, high‑quality, and sustainable growth. The trillion‑yuan panelboard sector has finally put an end to its era of unchecked expansion and entered a new cycle defined by quality and environmental sustainability.

Disclaimer: The text of this article is original content produced by the News Department of Muye.com, and the images are provided by the respective companies. Should any copyright issues arise, the relevant company shall bear responsibility. Copyright holders are kindly requested to contact this website, which will address such matters promptly.